It appears Australians have been sacrificing a lot of yard space over the past decade — new data show that they are building the same size of new homes but the land they are constructing them on to has been shrinking since 2012.
Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that the average land size of new houses decreased by 13%, down from 496 square metres in 2012 to 432 square metres in 2021.
The decline has been steady since 2012, except in 2016 when the site area for new houses increased in size.
Capital cities across the five largest states followed the downtrend, resulting in a more denser housing situation.
Greater Brisbane reported the biggest drop in average site area, down by 20% over the past decade from 571 square metres to 459 square metres.
Of all capital cities, Greater Adelaide posted the smallest decline in average land size at only 6%, from 498 square metres to 468 square metres.
Average site areas for new houses |
||
Greater Capital City Statistical Area |
Size (square metres) |
|
2012 |
2021 |
|
Greater Sydney |
514 |
423 |
Greater Melbourne |
490 |
429 |
Greater Brisbane |
571 |
459 |
Greater Adelaide |
498 |
468 |
Greater Perth |
448 |
399 |
Combined Capital Cities |
496 |
432 |
New house size staying the same
Interestingly, the average floor area of new houses approved over the last 10 years only declined by 1%, down from 245 square metres in 2012 to 242 square metres in 2021. This has led to an increase in the ratio of floor-to-site during the period, from 0.49 to 0.56.
Across the five biggest state capitals, Perth and Sydney reported the highest decrease in average floor size, with both reporting a 7% decrease.
Meanwhile, the average floor size of new homes in Melbourne remained the same over the past 10 years at 247 square metres.
Average floor areas for new houses |
||
Greater Capital City Statistical Area |
Size (square metres) |
|
2012 |
2021 |
|
Greater Sydney |
271 |
254 |
Greater Melbourne |
247 |
247 |
Greater Brisbane |
229 |
241 |
Greater Adelaide |
209 |
220 |
Greater Perth |
229 |
214 |
Combined Capital Cities |
245 |
242 |
Why land sizes are shrinking
REA Group economic analyst Megan Lieu said the cost of land is on top of the reasons why the trend of shrinking land sizes exists.
“With an expanding population, the amount of land we have in suburban areas is becoming more finite — this means that Australians have to pay a premium to buy homes with more land,” she said.
This could continue, Ms Lieu believes, as the increase in cost of living and rising rates make it impossible for Australians to pay premium on land.
The rise in urban infill is also a reason behind the trend.
“This involves repurposing underutilised areas, such as open green-space, of existing suburbs to build additional housing,” Ms Lieu said
“As most suburbs undergoing this transformation have infrastructure and transport, shared community spaces and are closer to jobs, land plots in these developments are smaller than what may be offered further out.”
—
Photo by @zacgudakov on Unsplash
Top Suburbs : alderley , lalor park , newcastle , mortdale , albion