Add Category
Fox Corp executives Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch can be called to testify at this month's defamation trial over a $US1.6 billion ($2.4 billion) lawsuit claiming the media company lied about voter fraud in the 2020 US presidential election.
- The two Murdochs were not on Fox's list of witnesses for the defamation trial
- Fox board member Paul Ryan could also be issued a trial subpoena
- A Fox spokesman said Dominion was trying to distract from its weak case
Rupert Murdoch, the 92-year-old chair of Fox Corp, and his son, Lachlan, its CEO, were not on the list of witnesses that Fox intends to make available for the trial, in a case brought by Dominion Voting Systems.
"If Dominion wants to bring them live, they need to do a trial subpoena and I would not quash it and I would compel them to come," Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis said.
Judge Davis said Fox board member Paul Ryan, a former Republican speaker of the US House of Representatives, could also be issued a trial subpoena.
A Fox spokesman said Dominion was trying to distract from its weak case.
"Demanding witnesses who had nothing to do with the challenged broadcasts is just the latest example of their political crusade in search of a financial windfall," said an email from Fox's Brian Nick
The judge said there was an objection by Fox to Rupert Murdoch's testimony which would probably have to be resolved at trial.
The trial already features a parade of Fox's biggest on-air personalities, including Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Maria Bartiromo.
The jury trial is scheduled to start on April 17 and expected to last about four weeks.
Dominion is hoping to prove Fox ruined its reputation by repeatedly airing false claims by former US president Donald Trump and others that its voting machines were used to steal the 2020 election for Democrat Joe Biden.
To prevail, Dominion must establish that Fox acted with actual malice, meaning it knowingly spread false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
Fox has argued its coverage was protected by the US Constitution's First Amendment because election fraud claims were inherently newsworthy, and its hosts and guests were entitled to express their opinions.
Judge Davis has rejected much of Fox's defence, and said Dominion's case was strong enough to go to a jury.
Reuters